The head of Kyrgyzstan’s State Committee for National Security (SCNS), Kamchybek Tashiev, recently announced that the work on the demarcation of the border between Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan is nearing completion. According to him, the issue of borders will soon be resolved, leaving no ambiguity regarding territorial boundaries. He presented this development as a legal safeguard and defense of Kyrgyzstan’s lands.
Why is the information predominantly disseminated by the Kyrgyz government?
Updates on the progress of border demarcation are mainly provided by Kyrgyz media outlets and officials. The Tajik government, in contrast, has shared little information or official commentary on the process. This limited communication may stem from the sensitivity of the issue, particularly in contested areas such as Vorukh and Chorkuh, which have long been sources of political and social tension. The Tajik government may be withholding information to prevent potential domestic unrest.
Are the residents of Vorukh and Chorkuh satisfied with the process?
Tajik media has offered minimal coverage of the perspectives of residents in disputed regions like Vorukh and Chorkuh. Historically, these communities have expressed dissatisfaction with perceived unfair territorial divisions. If the demarcation process is carried out without adequate consultation with local populations, there is a significant risk of protests, as residents may feel excluded and marginalized.
Why is sufficient information about the demarcation process not being provided?
In the past, Tajikistan reached an agreement with China over border demarcation, which was criticized by some as a cession of land to China. This precedent has heightened public concern about current border negotiations. If transparency is not ensured in this process, it could provoke internal disputes and amplify public dissatisfaction.
It is crucial for the Tajik government to ensure transparency in the border demarcation process and conduct comprehensive consultations with local communities. Addressing concerns over potential inequities in territorial division is essential to mitigate domestic unrest and foster public trust in the process.
